top of page
  • Writer's pictureRyan Cadry

Strengthening Employee Rights in California: The Impact of SB 497 on Retaliation Claims

California continues to lead the way in enhancing employee rights and protections. On October 8, 2023, a significant step was taken when Senate Bill No. 497, famously known as the Equal Pay and Anti-Retaliation Protection Act, was signed into law. This pivotal legislation marks a turning point in how retaliation claims are handled in the state, setting a new precedent for employee protection.

This groundbreaking legislation, effective from January 1, 2024, amends several sections of the California Labor Code, notably sections 98.6, 1102.5, and 1197.5. Its primary feature is the establishment of a rebuttable presumption of retaliation, which comes into play if an employee suffers adverse employment action within 90 days after participating in protected activities under these sections.

Key Aspects of SB 497

The crux of SB 497 lies in its amendment of California Labor Code Sections 98.6, 1102.5, and 1197.5. This amendment introduces a rebuttable presumption of retaliation when an employee faces disciplinary actions or dismissal within ninety (90) days following their involvement in protected activities under the California Labor Code and Equal Pay Act. This presumption significantly eases the burden on employees in proving a prima facie case of retaliation.

Transforming Retaliation Claims

Under the existing legal framework, proving retaliation involves a three-stage process. Initially, an employee must demonstrate a prima facie case of retaliation. Then, the employer is required to provide a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for their actions. Finally, the employee must establish that this reason is merely a facade for actual retaliation.

SB 497 changes this process by instituting a rebuttable presumption that automatically favors the employee’s claim if adverse action is taken within ninety days of a protected activity. In other words, the initial burden rests with the employer. This presumption shifts the onus to the employer to articulate a valid, non-retaliatory reason for their actions. Even if such a reason is presented, the employee can still argue that the actions were, in essence, retaliatory. Furthermore, SB 497 stipulates that any civil penalties awarded for violations of this nature directly benefit the affected employee.

Implications for Employees

This law significantly eases the path for employees to claim retaliation, though employers can still present legitimate reasons for their actions. For instance, if an employee is terminated after filing a complaint and claims retaliation, the employer must provide non-retaliatory justifications for the termination. However, employees still bear the responsibility to prove that these reasons are pretextual.

The Road Ahead

The introduction of this law marks a pivotal moment in California's labor law history. It underscores the importance for employers to heed employee complaints seriously, particularly regarding wage disputes and Labor Code violations. Employers must also meticulously document legitimate workplace issues to defend against potential retaliation claims. As we move forward, the full impact of this law on labor disputes and employer practices in California remains to be seen, but it certainly reinforces the state's commitment to protecting employee rights.



bottom of page